RESUMO
RESUMEN El camino para llegar a la diálisis peritoneal (DP) como tratamiento de la enfermedad renal crónica (ERC) avanzada estuvo jalonado por hitos a lo largo de la historia. Los conocimientos sobre la anatomía del peritoneo fueron aportados por los embalsamadores egipcios, Galeno (siglo II), y Vesalio (siglo XVI). Recién en 1628 Asellius Gaselli describe los capilares linfáticos abdominales. El siglo XIX fue rico en avances: se identificarn la célula como unidad de los seres vivos y el fenómeno de ósmosis (Dutrochet, 1828), los cristaloides y coloides y su pasaje o no a través de una membrana (Graham T, 1850), el flujo de solutos y partículas a través de la membrana peritoneal (v.Recklinghausen, 1863), la absorción de sustancias hipotónicas y el aumento del efluente con las hipertónicas (Wegner G, 1877), y experimentos en animales confirmaron que la remoción de fluidos y otras sustancias ocurría primariamente a través de vasos sanguíneos (Starling & Tubby, 1894). Pero recién en el siglo 20 se utilizó la DP como tratamiento. El primer intento de utilizar el peritoneo para tratar la uremia lo realizó Georg Ganter en 1923, primero en animales con ligadura de uréteres y luego en dos pacientes. Recién en 1937 se publicó el primer caso que sobrevivió a un "lavaje "peritoneal (Wear y col), pero fueron Fine, Frank y Seligman quienes inicialmente en perros nefrectomizados y luego en pacientes con injuria renal aguda (IRA) demostraron que el método no sólo era viable, sino también efectivo. Luego continuaron los progresos, sobre todo para pacientes con IRA, pero también en algunos casos con ERC avanzada: el doble frasco colgante (Maxwell M, 1959), la diálisis crónica intrahospitalaria con cicladora (Tenckoff y col, 1965), las bolsas plásticas para DP, hasta que en 1975 Moncrief y col pusieron en marcha la DP continua ambulatoria, y en 1981 se introdujo la DP automatizada. Los años noventa fueron de expansión de la DP, hoy instalada como una de las alternativas de tratamiento de la ERC avanzada.
ABSTRACT Milestones throughout history marked the path to reach peritoneal dialysis (PD) as a treatment for advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). The Egyptian embalmers, Galen (2nd century) and Vesalius (16th century) provided knowledge about the anatomy of the peritoneum. It was not until 1628 that Asellius Gaselli described the abdominal lymphatic capillaries. The 19th century was rich in advances: the cell was identified as the unit of living beings and the phenomenon of osmosis (Dutrochet, 1828), crystalloids and colloids and their passage or not through a membrane (Graham T, 1850), the flow of solutes and particles through the peritoneal membrane (Recklinghausen, 1863), the absorption of hypotonic substances and the increase in effluent with hypertonic ones (Wegner G, 1877), and animal experiments confirmed that fluid removal and other substances occurred primarily through blood vessels (Starling & Tubby, 1894). But it was not until the 20th century that PD was applied as treatment. The first attempt to use the peritoneum to treat uremia was made by Georg Ganter in 1923, first in animals with ureteral ligation and then in two patients. It was not until 1937 that the first case that survived a peritoneal "lavage" was published (Wear et al), but it was Fine, Frank and Seligman who initially in nephrectomized dogs and later in patients with acute kidney injury (ARI) demonstrated that the method was not only viable, but also succesful. Then progress continued, especially for patients with ARI, but also in some cases with advanced CKD: the double hanging bottle (Maxwell M, 1959), chronic intrahospital dialysis with a cycler (Tenckoff et al, 1965), plastic bags for PD, until 1975 when Moncrief et al launched continuous ambulatory PD, and in 1981 automated PD was introduced. The 1990s saw the expansion of PD, to date installed as one of treatment alternatives for advanced CKD.
RESUMO
Mucosal ulcerations are an oral complication that can often affect kidney transplant patients, mostly due to the effect of immunosuppression. It has been frequently reported drug-induced ulceration or lymphoproliferative disorders with buccal manifestations however, some unusual disorders should also be considered, such as fungal infections, viruses, as well as opportunistic infection by other microorganisms. Determining the etiology and differential diagnose from other causes of mouth ulcers is very important for the adequate treatment of said lesion. Dental health of patients should also be taken into the account prior to the transplant surgery, since periodontal pockets are the main niche of microbial reservoir. Moreover, mixed with oral microbiota, parasites such as Trichomonas spp. can be found in the dental plaque of patients with periodontal disease. Particularly, Trichomonas spp. are anaerobic motile-flagellated protozoa that can both induce tissue damage and exacerbate preexistent injuries in vaginal and oral mucosa. Parasitic infection in the oral cavity has not been well studied and it is thought to be underreported. In the present study we report the first case in literature of presence of Trichomonas spp. as a potential etiological factor of the oral ulcerations of a kidney transplanted patient that remitted after antibiotic treatment. Key words:Immunosuppression, protozoan, buccal lesion, oral mucosa, kidney transplant.
